Compare Collaborative Law to Other Dispute Resolution Methods
|
|
Collaborative Law |
Litigation |
Mediation |
Comments and Explanations |
|
Each party
has independent legal advice |
yes |
yes |
sometimes |
Mediators cannot give legal
advice to spouses. Sometimes (but rarely in Texas) clients will go to
mediation without lawyers. This will work in simple cases, but not in complex
cases where parties need advice about their legal rights. |
|
The parties
create customized solutions to fit their specific needs |
yes |
no |
yes |
Judges are required to follow
specific rules and guidelines that might not fit every situation. |
|
The parties
are in control of the pace of the divorce process |
yes |
no |
sometimes |
Mediation is often part of the
litigation system. Parties are required to try to settle through mediation
before they go to court. Mediation sessions often feel coercive to parties,
who have the threat of court looming before them. In the Collaborative Law
model, the parties decide on the pace they want to proceed, and know that
they might not get their interests satisfied if they are not willing to be
flexible about timing. |
|
Parties have
a structured process to follow as a "roadmap" to resolution |
yes |
no |
no |
Collaborative Law is a
structured process designed to promote settlement. |
|
Parties
cooperate in providing information needed to make informed decisions |
yes |
no |
sometimes |
The litigation model includes
discovery, which is often cumbersome and wastes the parties' resources.
Lawyers sometimes use a strategy where they give the other party only the
minimum required amount of information, hoping to gain an advantage at trial. |
|
Parties are
encouraged to treat the other party respectfully and to preserve important
relationships |
yes |
no |
yes |
Litigation pits people against
each other in a win/lose system. |
|
Parties have assurance that
their spouse's (or the other party's) lawyer will not use their words against
them |
yes |
no |
no |
Collaborative lawyers can
never take a case that is proceeding under the Collaborative Law model to
court. If a case needs litigation, the parties get different lawyers for
court. |
|
Parties learn
new, more useful ways to communicate as they move forward as co-parents |
yes |
no |
no |
In mediation, the parties
sometimes never see each other. The mediator uses "shuttle diplomacy" to try
to get the parties to reach an agreement. |
|
Both parties
have support from experts on financial, parenting and other issues that arise
in their case |
yes |
sometimes |
no |
Experts are hired in
litigation, but generally each party hires his or her own expert to support
his or her position. |
|
The parties
receive reliable information from experts when they need more information |
yes |
no |
no |
Experts hired for litigation
are expected to support a party's position. Often, each expert has wildly different
opinions, leaving the parties and the judge wondering if either is reliable. |
|
The parties
have a safe place to express their true interests and negotiate a workable
resolution |
yes |
no |
no |
While mediation taken alone
might provide a safe environment for negotiation, when paired with
litigation, it often feels coercive and overwhelming. |
|
Solutions are
based on what the parties want to achieve at a high level (their interests) |
yes |
no |
sometimes |
Some mediators use
interest-based negotiation methods, but often, without ongoing guidance, the
parties revert to positional bargaining.. |
|
Parties are
encouraged to look at the long- and short-term effects of their decisions |
yes |
no |
sometimes |
Neutral financial
professionals and child specialists bring a variety of services to clients in
Collaborative law. In litigation, they are just hired for the trial. |
|
Parties can
be forced to do or not do something |
no |
yes |
no |
Mediators cannot force a
settlement on parties. Arbitration is another alternative that does guarantee
resolution. |
|
Parties are
guaranteed that they will have a resolution to their problems |
no |
yes |
no |
A judge or jury will make a
decision, even if it seems to be the lesser of two evils, or to produce an
unfair result. |
|
Parties feel
threatened that they will lose at trial if they do not do what the other
party wants |
no |
yes |
yes |
As long as the parties are
operating within the Collaborative Law model, no one will go to court or
threaten to go to court. |
|
Parties and
lawyers work together to solve a problem |
yes |
no |
sometimes |
Lawyers, clients and experts
all have the same goal in Collaborative Law – to find a way to resolve
the parties' differences in a way that protects what is most important to
them. |
Copyright 2011 The Collaborative Law
Institute of Texas. All Right Reserved